Will Google bring the right to be forgotten to Canada?

About a year ago on, I examined the question whether we had the right to be forgotten. Then, It seemed that individual’s ability to be forgotten on the Internet was still up in the air. Now, it may actually be a right in Europe, and we are seeing more and more what that might look like here.

A recent decision by the EU courts, instructed Google to not display personal information that is “inadequate, irrelevant … or excessive in relation to the purposes for which they were processed and in the light of the time that has elapsed.” The decision itself centred around a Spanish man objecting to the search engine linking his name to a decade-old article about his house being repossessed.

What’s interesting in this case is that the newspaper’s right to publish this information wasn’t in question, nor was it decided that keeping that article online was inappropriate. The objection was to Google linking to the ‘out dated’ material.  Last month I wrote on the ‘legal identity crisis’ search engines faced, which is coming into focus here. American courts have been constructing search engines as a mix between magazines, who have editorial free speech in what they do and don’t ‘publish’ by linking to, and library indexes, who simply point to other’s speech, and aren’t making publishing decisions at all.  But the more recent ruling by the EU seems to address search engines, Google in particular, more as a function of the Internet.

The EU case has prompted renewed discussion of the “right to be forgotten” in North America. While nothing is written in stone when it comes to the Internet and the law, U.S. legislation like the Communications Decency Act immunizes search engines like Google from online defamation complaints. With America going so far as to allow Google to link to provably false information, it seems unlikely they will stop them from linking to outdated pages.

Canada’s future is less clear. Canadian law doesn’t immunize websites such as Google or Yelp from liability from online defamation, and the sites already have (poorly advertised) processes in place to accommodate takedown requests for defamatory material. It is in the realm of possibility that such a decision could make its way through the courts in Canada, and we may eventually see the right to be forgotten.

Monica Goyal
Monica Goyal
Monica Goyal, Entrepreneur, Lawyer and Innovator is the founder of Aluvion, a legal solutions company offering technology, paralegal and lawyer-driven solutions with a special focus on the quality, cost, and accessibility of legal services for both businesses and individuals. Monica began her career working as an engineer in R&D for companies like Toshiba, Nortel and Nokia while earning her Masters of Engineering at Stanford. Monica's history conditioned her to solve problems in a efficient and tech-savvy manner, an approach she brings with her to legal solutions. Monica currently sits on the Canadian Bar Association's Futures Initiative, and will be teaching a course on Legal Technology at York University’s Osgoode Hall. She was recently named one of 10 Women to Watch in Tech in the Journal of the American Bar Association.

Would you recommend this article?


Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication.

Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada

Featured Download

Latest Blogs

ITB in your inbox

Our experienced team of journalists and bloggers bring you engaging in-depth interviews, videos and content targeted to IT professionals and line-of-business executives.