Rogers-Shaw deal goes to federal court; Competition Bureau says proposed sale of Freedom to Vidéotron is ‘parasitic’

Today, the Competition Bureau is making its case in front of the Federal Court of Appeal in Ottawa, in its latest attempt to kill the Rogers-Shaw merger. 

The main arguments of the bureau revolved around legal errors that it claims led the Competition Tribunal to rule in favor of the transaction on Dec. 29, 2022.

The bureau also introduced TekSavvy’s appeal to the CRTC to review the merger as additional evidence for the appeal.

The Rogers-Shaw merger, according to the competition watchdog, should have been considered independently as a standalone transaction before looking at the side deal (the proposed sale of Freedom Mobile to Vidéotron), which it refers to as ‘parasitic’, as it lives or dies based on whether the merger agreement survives.

The Competition Tribunal said previously that the decision would not have been any different if the scrutiny had been carried out in the way the bureau wished.

The bureau argued today that it does not have a crystal ball to know for certain whether the outcome would have been different, but ‘doubt’ exists and that has to be cleared, especially when it concerns millions of Canadians in western provinces who are cell phone users. “They deserve to know.”

Furthermore, the bureau argued, the proposed divestiture of Freedom Mobile to Vidéotron is a remedy that is purely imbued with behavioural remedies (the future behaviour of the merged entity) rather than structural remedies (a one-shot measure intended to maintain/restore the structure of the market by creating a new/enhanced competitor). Behavioural remedies, the bureau argued, are not acceptable under Section 92 of the Competition Act.

This realization led Rogers and Shaw to shift gears in August 2022 and amend their pleadings and language to make it seem like the transaction is one with the proposed side divestiture, so that they would offset the behavioural components of considering Freedom-Vidéotron as a standalone remedy.

Accepting the Tribunal’s decision means circumventing the Competition Act, the bureau argued. “There’s an important balance between what the commissioner does and what the tribunal does, and the tribunal adjudicates on what’s brought before them,” it said, instead of redefining the very transaction brought before it.

It is not known whether today’s hearing will result in a same-day verdict. The deal will go through another round of scrutiny tomorrow by the House of Commons industry and technology committee, before it heads to Minister François-Philippe Champagne for the final verdict.

Shaw and Rogers are hoping to finalize the deal before Jan. 31 to avoid heavy penalties or lawsuits from investors.

Would you recommend this article?


Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication.

Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada

Featured Download

Ashee Pamma
Ashee Pamma
Ashee is a writer for ITWC. She completed her degree in Communication and Media Studies at Carleton University in Ottawa. She hopes to become a columnist after further studies in Journalism. You can email her at [email protected]

Featured Story

How the CTO can Maintain Cloud Momentum Across the Enterprise

Embracing cloud is easy for some individuals. But embedding widespread cloud adoption at the enterprise level is...

Related Tech News

Get ITBusiness Delivered

Our experienced team of journalists brings you engaging content targeted to IT professionals and line-of-business executives delivered directly to your inbox.

Featured Tech Jobs