Tens of thousands of Web sites have been compromised by an automated SQL injection attack, and although some have been cleaned, others continue to serve visitors a malicious script that tries to hijack their PCs using multiple exploits, security experts said this weekend.
Symantec Corp. cited reports by other researchers — including one identified only as “websmithrob” — that fingered a SQL vulnerability as the common thread. “The sites [were] hacked by hacking robot by means of a SQL injection attack, which executes an iterative SQL loop [that] finds every normal table in the database by looking in the sysobjects table and then appends every text column with the harmful script,” said websmithrob in a blog post. “It’s possible that only Microsoft SQL Server databases were hacked with this particular version of the robot since the script relies on the sysobjects table that this database contains.”
Hacked sites included both .edu and .gov domains, the SANS Institute’s Internet Storm Center (ISC) reported in a warning posted last Friday. The ISC also reported that several pages of security vendor CA Inc.’s Web site had been infected.
Grisoft’s Thompson said that his research had identified a 15-month-old vulnerability as one of those exploited by the attack code. The exploit, he said, targeted the MDAC (Microsoft Data Access Components) bug patched in April 2006 with the MS06-014 security update. “They went to the trouble of preparing a good Web site exploit, and a good mass hack but then used a moldy old client exploit. It’s almost a dichotomy,” said Thompson.
Another surprise, Thompson said, was the speed of the hack’s cleanup. Although a Google search still showed thousands of sites infected with the script on Saturday, Thompson claimed that Grisoft’s LinkScanner Pro tool indicated that nearly all had actually been scrubbed. “I found that really surprising [that they were cleaned so quickly],” he said in an interview via instant messaging on Sunday. “They’re all so disparate. If it was a big server farm, I could understand it being cleaned so quickly, but there doesn’t seem to be anything common about them all.”
“It looks like a bunch of these are still carrying the references to [the malicious domain] but not infectively,” said Thompson. “In other words, they’re still hacked, but the injection hasn’t worked properly.”
Microsoft was not immediately available for comment on the SQL Server vulnerability used by the mass hack.