Main Marketing Finance C.Suite
Small Business Centre Mid-Sized Business Centre
Email the Editor Email the Editor   Email a Friend Email a Friend about this article   Print this Page  Print friendly page

Savings windfall for firm that moved from Microsoft Outlook to Gmail

There are two million reasons why Taylor Woodrow -- a construction company -- is delighted that it switched its 1,800 employees from Microsoft Outlook to enterprise Gmail.
7/14/2008 7:00:00 AM By: C.G. Lynch

Savings windfall for firm that moved from Microsoft Outlook to ...

Taylor Woodrow, a UK-based construction company, has switched its 1,800 employees' e-mail from Microsoft Outlook to enterprise Gmail.

The company is also beginning to use other components of Google Apps, the suite of Web-based applications that includes, in addition to Gmail, calendar, chat, word processing, spreadsheets and wikis.

According to Rob Ramsay, Taylor Woodrow's IT director, the company has already realized a cost savings of nearly $2 million in licensing and support costs.

According to Google, Google Apps premier edition for enterprises costs $50 per user per year. In an interview with CIO, Ramsay cited four major lessons from implementing the enterprise version of Gmail and dabbling with Google Apps.

1. Easier E-mail Maintenance

Because Gmail is hosted by Google, Taylor Woodrow doesn't need to put the data on its own servers.

As a result, Ramsay says IT doesn't have to spend time or money maintaining e-mail servers (which is a where some of that $2 million in savings was realized).

This means it frees up IT to work on other applications and systems. Google also handles spam and messaging security, and so eliminates another task Ramsay's IT group had to manage.

This was especially a big deal for Taylor Woodrow, since 50 percent of the company's e-mail user base changes every year, he says.


2. Distributed Model Helps E-mail Security

With Gmail, Ramsay says that data is distributed across many machines on the back-end of Google, a fact he believes boosts e-mail security because it means his vendor is not putting all his eggs in one basket.

"We were determined not to have a single point of attack," Ramsay says. "If we did this [e-mail implementation] in a traditional method [on premise], there would have been a single point of attack," he says.

share: Twitter Facebook Digg
Sign up for our IT Business Newsletters
Page Navigation 1) Saving $2 million with Google's Web services - Page 1
2) Breaking the folders habit - Page 2
3) General Electric considering use of Google Apps - Page 3
>> Next Page 
<< Back
Bookmark:  delicious |   Google |   Technorati |   StumbleIt |   Yahoo!

Email a Friend Print This page
Related Articles
The thin men
CMI picks up e-mail security appliance
Allstate Canada tackles messaging issues throug...



blog comments powered by Disqus