If Bill Gates leaving Microsoft is the end of an era, then Ray Ozzie’s ascension is the beginning of a revolution designed to transform the company’s business model as well as redefine corporate IT infrastructures and how end users access, share and interact with applications and data.
Ozzie, who invented Lotus Notes and created Groove before selling it to Microsoft for US$120 million, is Gates’ successor and Microsoft’s point man to lead it into the online services era, what he calls “a time of great turbulence and potential change in the industry.”
In a 2005 memo to Microsoft’s executive staff, Ozzie said if Microsoft failed to respond to the advertising-supported services and software model sweeping the industry “our business as we know it is at risk.”
To understand the threat and why the golden slipper isn’t on Microsoft’s foot this time, one only need to know that industry experts predict that by May 2009 Google’s search business alone (not including AdSense) will be larger and more profitable than Microsoft’s most famous cash cow — Windows.
The services effort is the biggest test of Ozzie’s storied career.
With Gates leaving his full-time post July 1, the new chief software architect, at Microsoft since 2005, is officially on the clock as it ticks into the future.
His task is to meld Microsoft’s packaged-software pedigree with both consumer and corporate services, what the company calls “software plus services” and battle Google and other Web and Enterprise 2.0 companies.
“He certainly is regarded highly as a technical person, and he carries a certain amount of prestige,” says Dwight Davis, an analyst with Ovum Summit. “But it’s sort of a minefield for Microsoft to go down this path, but it understands it has to go down the path. With Gates gone there is going to be a new environment, and so there is going to be a more federated team at Microsoft. How that plays out is difficult to predict.”
Ozzie, a noted technologist like Gates, has established a framework for Microsoft’s services architecture; presided over the rollout of a mish-mash of consumer and enterprise services; and is spearheading the development of perhaps his most important effort to date — Live Mesh, an online data-sharing and synchronization service introduced in April. It will likely compete with Apple’s newly unveiled MobileMe and start-up services such as SugarSync and Joggle.”
Microsoft must also overhaul the nontechnical side where makeovers will be needed for its corporate culture, business model, and partner and customer relationships to accommodate a services model that includes lightning-fast development, new distribution strategies and superior customer service.
It’s all in its infancy, and has already suffered a hit with the failed bid to acquire Yahoo, a move designed to accelerate Microsoft’s online and advertising strategy.
Laying the ground work
Ozzie, however, has already dissected the challenge and is laying out his plan for a services framework that he hopes to have in place by the end of 2008. He has highlighted the importance of advertising to help fund the online effort, including Microsoft’s $6 billion acquisition of digital marketing vendor aQuantive late last year.
To underscore the task at hand, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said last year that eventually 25% of company revenue will come from Internet advertising; in fiscal 2007 the total was just more than 3.5%.
Improving those numbers could prove difficult.
“If you are able to win market share, eventually the profits have followed, but Microsoft has not shown that it knows how to make money on the Internet,” says Thomas Haigh, a historian of computing at the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee.
To help grow its advertising revenue numbers, Microsoft is investing in search, user retention, technology, operations, sales and communication services.
Ozzie’s services plan centers on three principals: using the Web as a hub, offering choice between on-premises software and hosted services, and providing a “fragmented” programming model that is defined by small components wired together on the fly.
His services framework has four layers: an infrastructure layer that is the physical platform to host and run services; a common services layer for such tools as the adCenter advertising platform, identity, synchronized storage and connectivity; a developer layer that includes protocols and APIs and the all-important Mesh Operating Environment that runs on the client and online; and the application layer that includes Live Mesh, Microsoft services such as hosted Exchange and SharePoint unveiled in April, and third-party services.
Ozzie also said in April virtualization will be critical for hosting services, especially consolidation of workloads to maximize CPU utilization and for isolating resources per customer.
He added that Microsoft in the past six months has recognized that it needs “a componentized or scalable Windows that starts with embedded and can be repackaged in other forms for a variety of different devices.”
The company last year began showing peeks at a minimalistic version of the Windows kernel called MinWin that is in the early development stages and may be the apple of Ozzie’s eye.
Microsoft currently has Windows Embedded CE and just this week announced that it has released the NavReady 2009 version optimized for portable navigation devices. The embedded operating system includes hooks to Microsoft Live Search.
The next big services unveiling will come in October at Microsoft’s annual Professional Developers Conference, where Live Mesh will get a beta upgrade and be distributed to more testers along with an early preview version of Microsoft’s Oslo modeling technology. The conference sessions will walk developers through building service-based applications and hooking into the Microsoft services framework.
Another challenge
At the same time Ozzie rolls out his plans and tries to resolve the dearth of concrete details, Microsoft as an organization must figure out how it will adapt to the services model.
“You can imagine the huge challenges in moving from a product-focused business model and sales culture, and you can imagine the huge philosophical, cultural and business model challenges they need to look at,” says Ken Thoreson, president of Acumen Management, which provides sales management consulting. Thoreson says Microsoft’s track record with executing the delivery and integration of new products into their existing model is spotty. “The question is how fast will they come out of the chute. Normally, they struggle with that,” he says.
Microsoft will have to deliver a top-notch support model for services customers and will eventually have to redefine its relationship with partners in terms of services.
Help crafting solutions to all these issues will come from the top.
“Priority No. 1 in terms of our long-term outlook is this transformation,” CEO Steve Ballmer told partners last year in a message he is likely to repeat next month when Microsoft’s partners gather in Houston for their annual conference. “It is an ambitious project for us, but it is very important.”
It is important in many ways because Microsoft has so much at stake, so much ground to make up and so much to prove for the first time without Gates at the helm.
“We are breaking from the proprietary lock-and-key model that has become commonplace under Gates’ tenure,” says Jim Zemlin, executive director of the Linux Foundation. “This next generation of computing is where Microsoft is struggling but where open standards are thriving: SaaS, cloud computing, Web 2.0 – they all run on open source. Ballmer and team have recognized the need for a new model that embraces open systems and where open source co-exists with proprietary software, but only time will tell if these actions really stick.”
Despite the monster it has been over the past two decades, the future may hold a more humble place for Microsoft if Ozzie, Ballmer and crew sans Gates can’t execute on the services plan.
