Microsoft's 'exploit prediction' track record sucks
Microsoft's predictions about whether hackers would create reliable exploit code for its bugs were right only a quarter of the time in the first half of 2009. That's not even as good as a coin toss, security experts note.11/6/2009 6:00:00 AM By: Gregg Keizer
Microsoft Corp.'s monthly predictions about whether hackers will create reliable exploit code for its bugs were right only about a quarter of the time in the first half of 2009, the company acknowledged Monday.
"That's not as good as a coin toss," said Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle Network Security. "So what's the point?"
Related stories:
User education key to IT security: Microsoft
How to foil 92 per cent of Microsoft Windows bugs
Microsoft gives up on fixing Office vulnerabilities, creates work-around
In October 2008, Microsoft added an "Exploitability Index" to the security bulletins it issues each month. The index rates bugs on a scale from 1 to 3, with 1 indicating that consistently-successful exploit code was likely in the next 30 days, and 3 meaning that working exploit code was unlikely during that same period.
The idea was to give customers more information to decide which vulnerabilities should be patched first. Before the introduction of the index, Microsoft only offered impact ratings -- "critical," "important," "moderate" and "low" -- as an aid for users puzzled by which flaws should be fixed immediately and which could be set aside for the moment.
But in the first half of this year, Microsoft correctly predicted exploits just slightly more than one out of every four times.
Sign up for our IT Business NewslettersPage Navigation 1) Microsoft's exploit prediction track record no better than a toss coin. - Page 1
2) Microsoft got it right only 27 per cent of the time. - Page 2
3) Customers may be better served by move to the Common Vulnerability Scoring System. - Page 3
| Bookmark: delicious | Google | Technorati | StumbleIt | Yahoo! |
| Related Articles | |
|
Speed vs. caution: The patch management dilemma Security firm retracts claim that Microsoft cau... Adobe responds to attacks with faster patching |
blog comments powered by Disqus
Line of Business

